Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 1997No. 97-846Published

1Per curiam

Allstate appeals the ruling of the county court, certified by the circuit court as a question of greát public importance under rule 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, questioning whether the provisions of section 627.736(4)(f), Florida Statutes, require “med pay” coverage to be extended to persons not otherwise insured for med pay, solely because they are insured for PIP coverage. Stated differently, Allstate contends that med pay coverage is not intended to be coextensive with PIP coverage.'

The controversy in this case focuses on the meaning of .section 627.736(4)(f):

Medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. SwearingenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Mosca v. Globe Indem.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Bolden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ZuckermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API