Legal Opinion

Dodaro v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 2010No. 1-09-0447WCPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hudson

As defined in the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2000)), the term “employee” excludes “any duly appointed member of a police department in any city whose population exceeds 200,000 according to the last Federal or State census.” 820 ILCS 305/l(b)(l) (West 2000). At issue in this case is whether claimant, Theresa Dodaro, who was injured while training to become a police officer for respondent, the City of Chicago, is a “duly appointed member” of respondent’s police department and therefore precluded from receiving benefits under the Act. We hold that claimant is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SheehanIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Baggett v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Murphy v. Mancari's Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Hamilton v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Interstate Scaffolding, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Majmudar v. House of Spices (India), Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  2. Johnson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. The City of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Travelers Ins. v. Precision Cabinets, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Baylay v. Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API