Mutual Investment Co. v. Wildman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago, the Hon. John D. Tuenbaugh, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley
It appears from the evidence in this case that the one thousand dollar note in question was signed by the defendants because they at that time believed that the representations of J. H. Frank, president of the Federal Co., that T. T. Wildman was then indebted to that company, were true, although as a matter of fact he was not then so indebted, and because of the agreement that the commissions to be earned by said Wildman should be applied in payment of said note, evidencing said supposed indebtedness. Three days after the execution of the note and before its maturity, J. H. Frank, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- First National Bank v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Brobston v. PennimanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Myron Ash, as Trustee of the J & W Corporation Liquidating Trust, Cross-Appellee v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Western Securities Co. v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Sherman State Bank v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
- Bondi v. Grant Thornton InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.