Legal Opinion
Frittita v. Pax
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in annulling the determination of the Town Board of Grand Island (Board) that denied the application of petitioner for a special use permit to keep a horse on her property and in directing the Board to issue a special use permit to petitioner. “Entitlement to a special [use] permit is not a matter of right (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v Larkin, 11 NY2d 20, 24) and compliance with ordinance standards must be shown before a special [use] permit can be granted (see Matter of Tandem…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lemir Realty Corp. v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Tandem Holding Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Wegmans Enterprises, Inc. v. LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Roginski v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Roginski v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. Town of West BloomfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matter of Rex v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of SennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of 1640 State Rte. 104, LLC v. Town of Ontario Planning Bd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022