Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roginski v. Rose

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 417).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roginski v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buitenkant v. RobohmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Elwood Properties, Inc. v. BohrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. L & M Realty v. Village of Millbrook Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Wisoff v. AmelkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Franklin Square Donut System, LLC v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API