Legal Opinion

Missouri General Insurance Company v. John David Youngblood and Roger Gayden, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1975No. 74-3148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEWIN, Circuit Judge:

The appellant, Missouri General Insurance Company (Company), commenced this action for declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 in order to ascertain the validity of an “offset” provision included in a policy issued by it to Floyd Thornberg, the owner of a pick-up truck involved in a collision with an uninsured motorist. Thornberg’s son, the driver of the truck at the time of the collision, was killed, and his passengers, the appellees, demand payment in settlement of the Company’s obligations under both the uninsured motorist and bodily injury liability…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Talbot v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Griffin v. Maryland Cas. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. LathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company v. PooleDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1976
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1984
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. American Motorists InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1982
  4. Spradlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gary P. Boatner Paula K. Boatner v. Atlanta Speciality Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API