Legal Opinion

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1971No. Appeal, No. 213PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

The issue before us concerns the interpretation to be placed on the indemnity provision of a written contract entered into by appellant (B. & W.) and appellee (F. & M.). It is therefore a question of law reviewable in this appeal, Dravo-Doyle Company v. Royal Indemnity Company, 372 Pa. 64, 92 A. 2d 554 (1952).

The provision is as follows: “Fischbach & Moore, Inc., Contractor, hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless The Babcock & Wilcox Company, its successors and assigns, from any and all claims, loss, damage, or expense on account of: (a) the death of, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Robinson v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L & R Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Hattersley v. BolltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Urban Redevelopment Authority v. Noralco Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API