Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
The issue before us concerns the interpretation to be placed on the indemnity provision of a written contract entered into by appellant (B. & W.) and appellee (F. & M.). It is therefore a question of law reviewable in this appeal, Dravo-Doyle Company v. Royal Indemnity Company, 372 Pa. 64, 92 A. 2d 554 (1952).
The provision is as follows: “Fischbach & Moore, Inc., Contractor, hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless The Babcock & Wilcox Company, its successors and assigns, from any and all claims, loss, damage, or expense on account of: (a) the death of, or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Robinson v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L & R Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hattersley v. BolltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Urban Redevelopment Authority v. Noralco Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.