Akzona, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether the flooding of downstream property caused by the erosion of an embankment, lawfully and purposely constructed across a stream, constitutes a taking as the trial court instructed the jury. We hold that this situation does not constitute a taking and the trial court erred in its instructions. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for a new trial.
I
Defendant, Southern Railway Company (Railroad), owns, maintains, and operates a railroad line which runs from Asheville to Murphy in North Carolina. This railroad…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3Cited by15 opinions
- Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Brewer v. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Estate of Fennell Ex Rel. Fennell v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Morgan v. Cavalier Acquisition Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Johnson v. Amethyst Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.