Legal Opinion

Westphalen v. Bankers Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1943No. 10286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

The judgment from which this appeal was taken, adjudicated that appellee was not liable, under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by it, for damage resulting from an accident, and restraining prosecution of any proceedings on the policy.

An automobile accident occurred involving an automobile driven by the individual appellants and a truck and trailer covered by the insurance in question, issued by appellee. Appellee brought this action to obtain a judgment declaring that it had no liability for the damage resulting from the accident in question, because the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Consolidated Shippers, Inc. v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. McDonald v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API