State v. Ramos
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.
*402 The defendant, Jose E. Ramos, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, (2) the court erred in failing to suppress evidence of his post- Miranda 1 silence, (3) the court committed plain error by admitting prior misconduct evidence, and (4) he was deprived of his due process rights as a result of prosecutorial impropriety. We are not persuaded by the defendant's claims on appeal and, accordingly, affirm the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- State v. RamosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019