Legal Opinion

State v. Ramos

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 5, 2017No. AC40390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.

*402 The defendant, Jose E. Ramos, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, (2) the court erred in failing to suppress evidence of his post- Miranda 1 silence, (3) the court committed plain error by admitting prior misconduct evidence, and (4) he was deprived of his due process rights as a result of prosecutorial impropriety. We are not persuaded by the defendant's claims on appeal and, accordingly, affirm the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  4. State v. RamosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API