Handley v. Oakley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This appeal is the aftermath of pur decision in Handley v. Anacortes Ice Co., 5 Wn. (2d) 384, 105 P. (2d) 505. In that case, which was an action brought for and on behalf of Reinhard Lehne, a minor, against the ice company and Ralph Oakley, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him, and to recover damages for medical and surgical expense incurred by the parents of the minor, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants. On appeal to this court, the judgment entered on the verdict was affirmed as to Oakley, and reversed as to the ice company,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Butte Brewing Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Wheeler v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.