Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul E. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1985No. 84-1152PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge:
Paul Davis was convicted of making false statements to a federally insured bank, mail fraud, and obstruction of justice. His appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on all counts. In addition, Davis contends that the obstruction counts should have been severed from the other charged offenses; that he was denied due process as a result of the trial court’s alleged antagonism and hostility; and that error resulted from the withholding of Brady material by the government. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
This is an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Samuel Duncan, Jr., Grace Duncan, Gay Nell Duncan, Marshall Sutton, Angela F. Turner, Arthur D. Wilson, and Oscar L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose Ramon Hernandez-PalaciosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.