State v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of having had sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female child on or about July 24, 1971, in violation of Minn. St. 609.295(3). The sole issue on appeal is whether, as defendant contends, the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict. We affirm. . ,
Decisions of this court have required corroboration in sex cases if the victim of the sex offense is a child and if the testimony of the victim is not clear and convincing. State v. Hoefker, 292 Minn. 470, 194 N. W. 2d 295 (1972); State v. Bergeron, 290 Minn. 1, 185 N. W.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ElijahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State v. ButenhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. BergeronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. HoefkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HesseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979