Legal Opinion

State v. Hoefker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1972No. 42113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant has pled guilty to incest and has received a sentence of up to 10 years in prison. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of a motion for a new trial, defendant also seeks review of an order denying him postconviction relief.

It is here argued that the evidence compels a finding defendant was induced to plead guilty for three reasons: First, he was not advised by counsel that his wife could not testify against him; second, counsel failed to inform him that he could not be convicted on the. complainant’s testimony without corroboration; and, third, he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ButenhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API