Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Bergan
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant Consolidated Freight-ways initially instituted suit to recover certain freight charges from the defendant-respondent, Herman W. Bergan, dba Commercial Tire Supply. Upon stipulated facts and the parties’ briefs, the magistrate court held for the defendant in a memorandum decision. The plaintiff appealed to district court which reversed and remanded the case for evidence pertaining to the intent of the parties. From the district court’s order remanding for further evidence, plaintiff appeals.
The stipulated facts are as follows:
Plaintiff, Consolidated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- C.F. Arrowhead Services, Inc. v. AMCEC Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985