Legal Opinion

Waterbury State Bank v. O'Neill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. 29250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lightner, District Judge.

Creditors’ bill by plaintiff bank to set aside a deed and two mortgages. The judgment of the district court was for plaintiff and ’all defendants have appealed. On September 15, 1931, John S. O’Neill gave his note of $2,645 to the bank which represented the amount he then owed it, which indebtedness had been in existence for a number of years. This note was payable on demand, and on January 30, 1933, the plaintiff secured a $3,003.50 judgment there*152on, upon which execution was issued and returned nulla bona prior to bringing this suit.

The deed which the bank seeks to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metz v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Flint v. ChaloupkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State Bank v. BelkNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Thies v. ThiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. J. S. Brittain Dry Goods Co. v. PlowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riggs v. HrochNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Farmers Elevator Co. v. PeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ternes v. WatkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Malone v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API