Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Belk

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1903No. 12,311PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

This is a creditors’ suit brought by the appellee against William Belk, Henrietta Belk, his wife, Nina Riggs, daughter of the said William and Henrietta Belk, and George A. Riggs, her husband. The undisputed facts are as follows:

At the May, 1899, term of the district court for Lancaster county the bank recovered judgment against Belk for about $450 and costs, taxed at upwards of $90. The basis of the judgment was a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“$300. Ceresco, Neb., Sept. 30, 1889.
“On demand after date,’ for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BowkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cornell v. RadwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Weightman v. HatchIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Wadsworth v. SchisselbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Dawson v. SimsOregon Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. FIRST NAT. BANK IN MITCHELL v. DaggettNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Service Mortgage Corp. v. WelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Flint v. ChaloupkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Riggs v. HrochNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Thies v. ThiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API