Clark v. Wallmark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Appellants, who are two of the six children and heirs at law of Annie Clark, deceased, filed, before probate, a contest of a document offered for probate *87as her will. After trial by the court sitting without a jury, an order was made admitting the wiE to probate, from which this appeal is taken.
The wiE purports to be both a holographic and a witnessed will. The grounds of contest are, that the wiE “is not such a document that complies with the law of California relating to holographic wEls,” that it “was not executed and attested with the formalities required by law,” that at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Estate of FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re Estate of VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of MaguireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Estate of SpiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Anderson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Schertzinger v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.