Legal Opinion
South Bay Boston Management, Inc. v. Unite Here Local 26
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 6, 2008No. Civil Action 08-11492-EFHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.
The court allows Defendant and Cross-Claimant UNITE HERE Local 26’s (the “Union”) Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 10) under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant South Bay Boston Management, Inc. (the “Hotel”) is ordered to submit to interest arbitration with respect to the collective bargaining agreement negotiations as required by paragraphs 10 and 14 of the parties’ neutrality agreement (the “Agreement”).
Facts
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- South Bay Boston Management, Inc. v. Unite Here, Local 26Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Unite Here Local 217 v. Sage Hospitality ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010