Legal Opinion

Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1944No. 1 Div. 222PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an ejectment suit, and the right of plaintiff to recover depends upon a legal question. The plaintiff and defendant claim under Everett and Boykin. The plaintiff by quitclaim deed from Taylor, Lowenstein and Company, to whom Everett and Boykin had conveyed it, and defendant by a later deed from Everett and Boykin.

Contemporaneously with the execution of the deed by Everett and Boykin to Taylor, Lowenstein and Company, there was a separate agreement in writing executed by them both, whereby it was agreed that the deed was executed as security for any indebtedness then…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Sewall v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Chapman v. GlassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  4. Doe ex dem. Nickles v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Mallory v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Trauner v. LowreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. K & C DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. R. B. Ethridge & Associates, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  5. Atlas Subsidiaries of Florida, Inc. v. KornegaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API