Legal Opinion
Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 6, 1971No. Civ. A. No. C-3005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WINNER, District Judge.
Jurisdiction of this three-judge case is founded upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325, inclusive; upon 49 U.S.C. § 305(g) and upon 5 U.S.C. § 701. The Interstate Commerce Commission has ruled that Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. cannot serve Reno, Nevada, under its existing authority, and plaintiffs ask that the Commission’s order be set aside to the extent that the order prohibits “interchange in Nevada by plaintiff Rings-by-Pacific, Ltd.”
An abbreviated history of the matter follows. Fortier Transportation Company was an intrastate carrier operating in California…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Denver Chicago Transport Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1960
- Beeline Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
- Lund v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
3Cited by1 opinion
- R-C Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1972