Legal Opinion

Arruda v. Hearthstone Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1966No. 637PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This is an action of contract, and the plaintiff’s declaration in substance alleges the defendant issued two policies of insurance to him in .consideration of his payment of the premiums, that on November 2, 1962, while said policies were in effect, he was disabled by an accident covered by the terms of the policies, and that he had submitted due proof thereof to the defendant and has not been paid.

The defendant’s answer was a general denial, and a further averment that the disability suffered by the plaintiff did not occur under circumstances covered by the contracts of insurance.

The case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Redden v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. NICHOLS & CO. INC. v. Travelers Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Improved MacHinery, Inc. v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magna Vend, Inc. v. CournoyerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API