Legal Opinion
Van Curler Development Corp. v. City of Schenectady
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Bascom, J.
This is an action for specific performance of alleged contracts for the purchase and sale of real property. The City of Schenectady was the owner of certain parcels, title to which it had acquired in proceedings resulting from default in the payment of taxes. William J. Venezio, under date of April 25, 1966, addressed a letter to the Assistant Corporation Counsel of the city offering to buy three parcels, namely 487 Nott Street for $500, 526-528 Clarendon Street for $475, and 2440 Lenox Road for $525. The letter stated that it was the intention of Venezio to “ repair and refurbish” the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bolt Electric, Inc. v. The City of New York, Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Kim v. Town of OrangetownNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re L & v. Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Ceravolo v. BucknerNew York Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.