Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Alva State Bank and Trust Co. v. Dayton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1988No. 70097Published

1Concurrence

KAUGER, Justice,

specially concurring:

The Oklahoma Financial Privacy Act, 6 O.S.1981 § 2201, et. seq., provides the procedure by which a governmental authority, in this case a judge, may require production of bank records. I agree with the majority that these records are clearly confidential, and that bank customers who are not parties to the lawsuit have a reasonable expectation of privacy in them. (These are private citizens whose records have been requested for inspection solely on the basis that they chose to do business with Alva State Bank and Trust Company.)

Congress has specifically…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Gore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. In re Pacific Railway CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API