Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Willamette Valley Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries resulting from a collision between an automobile and a mixed interurban electric train owned and operated by the defendant company.

The gist of plaintiff’s action is thus alleged in the complaint:

III

“On or about December 20th, 1930, at the hour of about 5:30 p. m., on a dark night, the plaintiff was proceeding in Ms automobile on the Beaver Creek Highway in a Northwesterly direction toward Oregon City. At said time the defendant was operating on schedule its regular passenger motor car on its said railroad, which was traveling in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Clamper v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Dimond v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Ullrich v. Columbia & CowLitz Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Reines v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API