Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 28, 1897PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond, pronounced February 10, 1893, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellee, Harry F. Smith, was the complainant, and James Hetherwood and others, were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The commissioners who were directed to make the sales in this case, reported to the court on the 11th of October, 1892, that they had sold the forty-two acre parcel of land to the appellant for the price of $1,800, and that the conditions of the sale were “that he should pay $1,800 of the purchase money in cash, and assume the mortgage of $10,000, and also have the ‘Quarry tract,’ which was also subject to the lien of the mortgage, released from the same.” They reported further that the appellant had paid “$1,000 as earnest of his good faith in the premises, but has not otherwise proceeded to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clarkson v. ReadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
  2. Langyher v. Patterson & BashSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Warfield v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Andrews v. . O'MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Hickson v. RuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Carter v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Chandler v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dunn v. SilkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Harman v. StearnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  5. Carlsen v. CarlsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API