Legal Opinion

Harman v. Stearns

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 8, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Smyth county rendered December 14, 1894, in an action of ejectment wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

EranMin Stearns instituted an action of ejectment against William H. Harman, defendant, for the recovery of a tract of land. When the case came on for trial upon the defendant’s plea of “not guilty,” a jury was waived, and all matters, both of law and fact, by consent of counsel, were submitted to the court, which, after hearing the evidence, entered a judgment for the plaintiff for the premises in the declaration mentioned.

*60The plaintiff’s claim of title is deduced from Robert Morris, who, in May, 1794, obtained a grant from the Governor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Games v. Stiles Ex Dem. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Fulkerson v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Sandusky v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Gudger v. . HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Waggoner v. DodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Wilson v. BradenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  5. Hill v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API