Legal Opinion

Arndt v. Arndt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

The question involved in this motion was recently under consideration by this court in Berry v. Berry, 139 Or. 401 (2 P. (2d) 1110), and in La Follett v. La Follett, 138 Or. 411 (2 P. (2d) 1109), where the former decisions of this court are fully reviewed and followed.

On the authority of those cases, the motion is denied for the present, reserving further consideration until the final hearing.

It is so ordered.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LaFollett v. LaFollettOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Berry v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claude v. ClaudeOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. McCarthy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Huffine v. HuffineVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API