Legal Opinion

LaFollett v. LaFollett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

This is an application for an order allowing plaintiff the snm of $50 as additional suit money and the snm of $500 as additional attorney’s fees in this conrt, based upon the affidavit of plaintiff wherein it is shown that the decree of the lower court provided that defendant should pay the plaintiff for the care and support of their minor children, commencing the 15th day of February, 1931, the sum of $75 per month, and further, that plaintiff have judgment against defendant for the sum of $750 attorney’s fees, and $126.25 costs and disbursements; that the defendant has failed and refused to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Arndt v. ArndtOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Maley v. MaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Berry v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Banick v. BanickOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API