Legal Opinion
Ridder v. Ridder
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
This motion to adjudge defendant in contempt for his failure to comply with an order directing the payment of temporary alimony and a counsel fee is resisted upon the sole ground that *85the order directing payment and the order to show cause why the adjudication of contempt should not be made were not served upon the defendant personally within the State of New York.
The defendant was personally served with the summons and complaint in New York, or, what is equivalent thereto, made a general appearance in the action by attorneys, participated in the reference upon the question of the amount of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Giles v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ginsberg v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Ageloff v. AgeloffNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Long v. LongNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Crawford v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Palmer v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.