Legal Opinion

Bettis v. Perry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 1963No. 905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation suit. The plaintiff sues his employer and its compensation insurer. The claimant was awarded benefits for total and permanent disability. Consequently, the defendants appeal.

The plaintiff was a plasterer and cement worker of twenty-seven years experience. The virtually uncontradicted medical evidence shows that he is now disabled from following this skilled trade because of a sensitization to the lime component of cement and plaster. As a result, the claimant at once suffers from a rash of increasing and disabling severity upon attempting to work…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aymonde v. State National Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Picquet v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Ware v. Industrial Timber Products, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rawls v. Dixie Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Bettis v. PerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API