Bettis v. Perry
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation suit. The plaintiff sues his employer and its compensation insurer. The claimant was awarded benefits for total and permanent disability. Consequently, the defendants appeal.
The plaintiff was a plasterer and cement worker of twenty-seven years experience. The virtually uncontradicted medical evidence shows that he is now disabled from following this skilled trade because of a sensitization to the lime component of cement and plaster. As a result, the claimant at once suffers from a rash of increasing and disabling severity upon attempting to work…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aymonde v. State National Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Picquet v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ware v. Industrial Timber Products, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rawls v. Dixie Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Bettis v. PerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963