Trimble v. Dzieduzyiki
New York Supreme Court
Action by an executor for construction of marriage settlement and will, for directions and an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.
In the year 1871 Elberta P. Jones, then a resident of the state of Hew York, was married to the count Michael Dzieduzyiki, a subject of the empire of Austria, domiciled in the kingdom of Italy. Previous to the marriage, and on the 21st day of October, 1871, an instrument, in the nature of a marriage settlement, was executed by and between her and her future husband, and the plaintiff, individually, and as the trustee under the will of Elbert P. Jones; the father of Elberta, and as her general guardian.
In which instrument, it was recited, as the fact was, that Elberta was entitled to a large…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Despard v. . ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Harvey v. RichardsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1818
- Earl v. DresserIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- McLoskey v. ReidNew York Surrogate's Court · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1944
- In re the Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- In re the Will of CoburnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894
- In re the Estate of WhiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
- In re Ancillary Letters of Administration With the Will Annexed of McShaneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.