Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Coburn

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Proceedings for probate of "will.

1Opinion of the Court

Coleman, S.

The testatrix on the 10th day of June, 1884, being at the time a resident of the State of New Jersey and an unmarried woman, made her will. On, the 22d day of June, 1884, being still a resident of the State of New Jersey, she married Bartholomew Coburn, also a resident of that State, and they continued to reside in that State until the year 1889, when they removed to the town of Monroe, in the State of New York, where the testatrix died, without children, leaving her said husband her surviving. That will is now here offered for probate.

The husband objects upon the ground that, by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Trimble v. DzieduzyikiNew York Supreme Court · 1878
  3. In re BraithwaiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1887
  4. In re the Estate of WitterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1891
  5. McLarney v. PhelanNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Large v. DierckenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Estate of BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Estate of BraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of CulleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API