Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Aberdeen Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1996No. 95-0405PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

John Jay Stokes, Gem Stokes, and Stokes Properties, Inc. seek reversal of the dismissal of their appeal. They argue that the court of appeals erroneously held they filed their appeal bond late. The issue is the construction of Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The trial judge signed a summary judgment against the Stokes on June 16, 1994. However, the district clerk’s postcard notice to the Stokes erroneously stated the date was June 19, 1994. On Monday July 18, the Stokes forwarded their motion for new trial to the district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McRoberts v. RyalsTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mr. Penguin Tuxedo Rental & Sales, Inc. v. NCR Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Silk v. TerrillTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Moore v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Combined Specialty Insurance Co. v. Deese, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. Garcia v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  3. Williams v. SchneiberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Barganier v. Saddlebrook Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
  5. Kreit v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API