Legal Opinion
Excelsior Union High Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Lautrup
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1969No. Civ. 31717PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Excelsior Union High School District of Los Angeles County, the plaintiff in this eminent domain proceeding, appeals from the trial court’s order awarding defendants and respondents a total of $77,265 for attorneys’ fees following plaintiff’s abandonment of the proceeding. The award was made pursuant to the provisions of section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
For the purpose of facilitating the reader’s understanding of the relevance of the facts to be recited in our statement of the ease, we shall first set forth this brief summary of appellant’s basic contentions, namely:(1) That the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Davis v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Westover Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Melnyk v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Fed-Mart Corp. v. Pell Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Horn v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Krechuniak v. NoorzoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.