GF CO. v. Pan Ocean Shipping Co., Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GADBOIS, District Judge.
On February 10, 1992, this Court heard plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment or in the alternative for summary adjudication of issues. Dennis Seider of Seider & Cohan appeared for plaintiff The GF Company. David E.R. Woolley of William, Woolley, Cogswell, Nakazawa & Russell appeared for defendant Pan Ocean Shipping Company, Ltd. Having considered the papers submitted in support of and' in opposition to this motion, the arguments of counsel, and the entire record herein, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for summary judgment for the reasons expressed below.
I.BACK…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Alkmeon Naviera, S.A. v. M/V MARINA LCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- G.F. Company v. Pan Ocean Shipping Co., Ltd., Aka, Panobulk America, Inc., and Pan Queen, Its Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture Banque IndosuezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994