Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Ohashi

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00696Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 MARK MAYES, No. C18-0696 RSM 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 ALEXANDER OHASHI and ACE PARKING, 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Alexander Ohashi and Ace Parking’s 18 Motion for Summary Judgment against pro se Plaintiff Mark Mayes. Dkt. #35. Mr. Mayes 19 claims that Defendants discriminated and retaliated against him because of his race and has also 20 moved for summary judgment. Dkt. #39. The Court…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API