Legal Opinion

Kunz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.

Plaintiffs were and most of them still are employed by the sanitation department of the City of New York as crane enginemen. They were appointed from competitive civil service lists and prior to March 15,1945, were paid on a per diem basis for 313 days a year at the then prevailing rate of $15 a day. They earned $4,695 annually. On the date mentioned, as a result of instructions from the director of the budget and because of budgetary changes resulting from a rise in prevailing wage rates, plaintiffs and others similarly employed were offered agreements providing for a yearly salary of $4,000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thoma v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Matter of Barmonde v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Sheridan v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. DeLury v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. City of Mount Vernon v. State of New York Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. DeLury v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Abarno v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API