Legal Opinion · Dissent

Desert Irrigation Co. v. Tolmie

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1983No. 14823Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

Twelve jurors, the trial judge, and Judge Burnett have sided with Desert Irrigation. I join that group. The other group takes the position that it was error on the part of Judge Doolittle to not have granted a directed verdict.

*79In Judge Burnett’s opinion, he correctly points to the error in the Court of Appeals’ opinion which “equates the case to one in which there was either no express contract, a contract silent on compensation, or a failure to perform the contract.” Desert Irrigation v. Tolmie, 103 Idaho 673, 678, 651 P.2d 938, 943 (1983). In my view this Court’s review of the law of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peavey v. PellandiniIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Desert Irrigation Co., Inc. v. TolmieIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API