Legal Opinion

People v. Ansite

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1952No. Crim. 4743PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty on four counts of forgery after trial before a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Facts: Defendant forged the name “B. C. Robles” on four different checks, naming Donna M. Nolan as the payee. The payee in turn cashed each of the checks with various merchants in Los Angeles County. At the time the checks were drawn by defendant on the Bank of America, Wilmington Branch, the bank did not have an account with a "B. C. Robles.”

After the information charging defendant with forgery was filed he was represented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. LooneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ShroyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API