Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1973No. 48550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

In an action for injuries inflicted on the child Carol Thomas by a dog named "Poochie,” Carol and her father, plaintiffs (Thomases) appeal from the grant of a summary judgment to the defendants-owners (Richardsons).

On the motion, the depositions of the Thomases and Carol and of the Richardsons and their young son Robbie were in evidence, as well as affidavits of the Richardson parents both of whom stated that the dog was kept in a fenced yard, they had no previous knowledge that he was vicious, and they knew him to be gentle.

The evidence shows that both Robbie and Carol…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. IdeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Starling v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Keener v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Wright v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API