Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Bedford-Chevrolet Sales Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 4, 1929No. 3476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action in equity for relief by injunction and damages because of the alleged infringement by the defendant of United States patent No. 1,493,814, issued to George H. Higgins, assignor, to James Thruston Wolfe, the plaintiff, for'folding top for vehicles, dated May 13, 1924, on an application filed August 22) 1914.

The single claim of the patent reads as follows:

“A foldable vehicle top comprising a main bow, a front bow, two-part jointed side arms projecting said front bow forwardly from said main bow, an intermediate bow pivoted to and extending from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. De Lamar v. De Lamar Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Electric Products Corp. v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Dennis v. Great Northern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1931
  3. Beemack Furnace Co. v. Eureka Steel Range Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API