Legal Opinion

176 East 123rd Street Corp. v. Flores

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 16, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMastin' B. Stecher, J.

This is a motion to direct the Clerk of this court to restore to the moving parties, the tenants in these proceedings, rents previously deposited by them under an order made by me pursuant to section 755 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law.1 In the 40-year history of this statute2 no similar motion had been recorded in any reported case.

On July 30, 1969, the tenants'upon the admissions and stipulations of the landlord, effectively established their defense under that statute to the landlord’s summary proceedings for the nonpayment of rent. Indeed the stipulation was surplusage,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Boreel v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Davar Holdings, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Davar Holdings, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Schaeffer v. MontesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Markese v. Cooper, New York County Courts1972
  2. 176 East 123rd Street Corp. v. FrangenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Torres v. RagonesiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API