Legal Opinion
176 East 123rd Street Corp. v. Frangen
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 7, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin B. Stecher, J.
The respondents, former tenants of the petitioner, move anew for an order directing the clerk of this court to restore to them rent deposited pursuant to an order made by me nearly two years ago (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 755).
The history of this litigation and of the statute on which it is based has been fully reported (176 East 123rd St. Corp. v. Flores, 65 Misc 2d 130) and need not be repeated here. Suffice to say the prior application was denied because the intent of the *283statute was to coerce landlords to comply with applicable housing laws; the landlord had cured some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sayles v. . BestNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Asher v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Emray Realty Corp. v. De StefanoNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Kahn v. Riverside Syndicate, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- 941 Park Avenue Corp. v. FriedAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DiSanto v. Wellcraft Marine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. 849 St. Nicholas EquitiesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rouse v. Industrial Commissioner of New York (In re Rouse)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Leejon Realty Co. v. DavisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.