Legal Opinion

Matter of Perez

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 3, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

104 N.J. 316 (1986)

517 A.2d 123

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN PEREZ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 22, 1985.

Decided November 3, 1986.

David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, argued the cause for Office of Attorney Ethics.

S.M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for respondent (Franzblau, Falkin & Goldman, attorneys).

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding results from a random compliance audit of the trust funds of respondent, John Perez, by the Division of Ethics and Professional Services (Division) pursuant to Rule 1:21-6(c). At the time of the audit, respondent was a sole…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API