Legal Opinion

Krom v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Pennock, J.

This is a motion by the defendant bank for an order and judgment dismissing the complaint upon the grounds that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

On August 29, 1969, one Stanley Levy purchased from the defendant, Chemical Bank, three money orders in the amount of $500 each, making a total purchase of $1,500. The money orders were blank as to date, payee, and the maker’s name and *1061address. The purchaser, Levy, completed the money orders by filling in the blank portions thereof. Five days later, on September 3, 1969, Levy requested the Chemical Bank to place a stop payment on all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kerr Steamship Co. v. Chartered Bank of India, Australia & ChinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sequoyah State Bank v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. First National Bank v. Duncan Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Manhattan Imported Cars, Inc. v. Dime Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
  4. Krom v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Sequoyah State Bank v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API