Legal Opinion
Hardell v. Vanzyl
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 2024No. A168113Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/20/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CAILIN HARDELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, A168113 v. ADRIAN VANZYL, (City & County of San Francisco Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. CGC22602112) Cailin Hardell appeals from the trial court’s order granting Adrian Vanzyl’s motion to quash. Hardell sued Vanzyl, along with Waleed Mohsen and Blumberg Capital, for sexual assault and battery, sexual harassment, and retaliation, among other claims, relating to an incident in Miami, Florida in March 2022. Vanzyl…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.