Legal Opinion

Ford v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 1984No. 83-8542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the United States Marshal for the Northern District of Georgia, as intervenor-appellant, from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The order requires the U.S. Marshal to bear the entire habeas corpus ad testificandum responsibility for producing a state prison inmate in federal district court to testify at the trial of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against county employees.

The U.S. Marshal argues that under Ballard v. Spradley, 557 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1977), the responsibility of compliance with a writ of habeas corpus ad…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballard v. SpradleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Wiggins v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Walker v. LeaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Mississippi · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Garland v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Ford v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Garland v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Garland v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API