Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Garland v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-1283Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAtkins, District Judge

I concur in Part I and Part II.B. of Judge Gibbons’ opinion. However, because I agree with the decisions of the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits in Ballard v. Spradley, 557 F.2d 476 (5th Cir.1977) and Ford v. Allen, 728 F.2d 1369 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam), and with the Ninth Circuit in Wiggins v. County of Alameda, 717 F.2d 466 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1425, 79 L.Ed.2d 749 (1984), I respectfully dissent from the judgment.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballard v. SpradleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Wiggins v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ford v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984