Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rotzin v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1938No. 29976Published

1Dissent

Rose, Eberly and Day, JJ.,

dissenting.

Being firmly convinced from the standpoints of law, equity, fact and justice that the opinion of the majority upon a trial ele novo is wrong in every material respect, we are impelled to make a solemn protest against the decision.

The controversy is between plaintiff, who was a female minor, and three men of affairs, defendants, who acted for her during her minority and wrongfully since as trustees in handling for her $5,000 which they received for her from her grandfather under his duly probated will.

The record shows conclusively by uncontradicted evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Union Trust Co. (Hoffman Estate)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Nebraska Power Co. v. KoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Masonic Building Corp. v. CarlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Yost's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API